Splitted DOS
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm
Splitted DOS
Hi,
I did a DOS calculation for a the adsorption of Oxygen on Co. The DOS profile of Oxygen shows the significant contribution of d-orbital to the total DOS (s+p+d).
I was just wondering what does it mean, as oxygen has no d orbital. Should I ignore the d orbital and consider s+d as the total?
I d really appreciate your help.
Cheers
Kambiz
I did a DOS calculation for a the adsorption of Oxygen on Co. The DOS profile of Oxygen shows the significant contribution of d-orbital to the total DOS (s+p+d).
I was just wondering what does it mean, as oxygen has no d orbital. Should I ignore the d orbital and consider s+d as the total?
I d really appreciate your help.
Cheers
Kambiz
Last edited by kambiz on Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:35 pm
- License Nr.: 5-532
- Location: Ghent, Belgium
- Contact:
Splitted DOS
make sure that your wigner-seitz radius is not to big (i.e. try to have none overlapping spheres in your system) If you have overlapping spheres you might actually be seeing d-states of Co
Last edited by Danny on Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm
Splitted DOS
Thanks Danny,
Yeah that s the reason. I should try their covalant radius.
Yeah that s the reason. I should try their covalant radius.
Last edited by kambiz on Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Splitted DOS
Be aware that the DOSCAR section in the manual is outdated...
The ordering in the DOSCAR (You will have 9 columns for a non spin-polarized calculation) is explained here:
http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-forum/ ... php?4.3477
So maybe you might have mistaken d states for p states of O.
The ordering in the DOSCAR (You will have 9 columns for a non spin-polarized calculation) is explained here:
http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-forum/ ... php?4.3477
So maybe you might have mistaken d states for p states of O.
Last edited by Dr_Nick on Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm
Splitted DOS
Thanks Dr_Nick
I knew that
I m using Vasp TST Tools (http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/). It can correctly read DOSCAR files.
I knew that
I m using Vasp TST Tools (http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/). It can correctly read DOSCAR files.
Last edited by kambiz on Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm
Splitted DOS
Hi Danny,
Is it possible that because of the large wigner-seitz radius, 3d-Co state affects also the 2p-O??
Cheers
Is it possible that because of the large wigner-seitz radius, 3d-Co state affects also the 2p-O??
Cheers
Last edited by kambiz on Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:35 pm
- License Nr.: 5-532
- Location: Ghent, Belgium
- Contact:
Splitted DOS
If they overlap in energy I think it could be possible that they get projected there too. The best way to find out is by
1) comparing the different attomic dos's
2) play with the WZ radius If they disappear (for a reasonable value), this shows they should not be there.
Danny
1) comparing the different attomic dos's
2) play with the WZ radius If they disappear (for a reasonable value), this shows they should not be there.
Danny
Last edited by Danny on Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.