Hi all,
I am calculating the properties of several f-electron compounds. I would like to ask the users' opinion about the volume optimization in an f-electron system: which way is better, with LDA/GGA or with LDA+U/GGA+U?
thanks,
Zs
volume optimization
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:47 am
- License Nr.: 74
- Location: USA
volume optimization
Last edited by zsoltrak on Tue Feb 26, 2013 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
volume optimization
The LDA/GGA+U techniques are developed to correct band energies of non-bonding electrons. This should not influence the cell volume.
Last edited by admin on Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2007 12:47 am
- License Nr.: 74
- Location: USA
volume optimization
Dear admin,
Thank you for the reply. I agree with your comment, that there is no fundamental physical reason to use LDA+U/GGA+U methods for volume optimization. However, we observe a change in the lattice parameters when we go from LDA/GGA to LDA+U/GGA+U. Also, from a brief search of the literature we found that, in many cases, people tune the Hubbard-U parameter to reproduce the experimental lattice constants.
I would appreciate further thoughts and insights into this issue ...
Thanks,
Zs.
Thank you for the reply. I agree with your comment, that there is no fundamental physical reason to use LDA+U/GGA+U methods for volume optimization. However, we observe a change in the lattice parameters when we go from LDA/GGA to LDA+U/GGA+U. Also, from a brief search of the literature we found that, in many cases, people tune the Hubbard-U parameter to reproduce the experimental lattice constants.
I would appreciate further thoughts and insights into this issue ...
Thanks,
Zs.
Last edited by zsoltrak on Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.