POSCAR for extended solids

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
call_me_Al
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:05 pm
License Nr.: 5-2273

POSCAR for extended solids

#1 Post by call_me_Al » Tue Nov 22, 2016 6:42 pm

Hi there,

I am having trouble correctly implementing a POSCAR to represent a group of atoms. I want to represent a group of 14 (or more) atoms in an FCC structure. I have tried to do this in many ways, but am always getting errors and the OUTCAR gives co-ordinates that don't really make sense.

Can anyone give me an example of how to define a large number of atoms in a crystal structure?

thanks!

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

Re: POSCAR for extended solids

#2 Post by alex » Wed Nov 23, 2016 12:08 pm

Hi Al,

could you send an example please?

Thx

alex

call_me_Al
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:05 pm
License Nr.: 5-2273

Re: POSCAR for extended solids

#3 Post by call_me_Al » Wed Nov 23, 2016 1:05 pm

for example to make an fcc box with 14 atoms I am trying to do it like this, unit scaling and lattice vectors in X,Y,Z, then directly place the atoms where they should be. Still not sure about Cartesian or direct in this case, but I always get atoms overlapping on top of each other hence an error.

Al
1.0
4.05 0.0 0.0
0.0 4.05 0.0
0.0 0.0 4.05
14
Cartesian
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.5 0.5
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 0.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 1.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
1.0 0.5 0.5
0.5 1.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 1.0

call_me_Al
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:05 pm
License Nr.: 5-2273

Re: POSCAR for extended solids

#4 Post by call_me_Al » Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:19 pm

after some playing around with visualisation tools, I managed to get closer to what I want. This POSCAR gives a cube of what looks like 4X full unit cells of fcc Al. This is achieved with 32 atoms as follows. Does this make sense to use as an extended solid?

Al FCC
2.0
4.05 0.0 0.0
0.0 4.05 0.0
0.0 0.0 4.05
Al
32
Direct
0.0 0.0 0.0 # 1
0.5 0.0 0.5 # 2
0.5 0.5 0.0 # 3
0.0 0.5 0.5 # 4
0.5 0.0 0.0 # 5
0.0 0.5 0.0 # 6
0.0 0.0 0.5 # 7
0.25 0.0 0.25 # 8
0.25 0.25 0.0 # 9
0.0 0.25 0.25 # 10
0.75 0.0 0.25 # 11
0.25 0.75 0.0 # 12
0.0 0.25 0.75 # 13
0.25 0.0 0.75 # 14
0.75 0.25 0.0 # 15
0.0 0.75 0.25 # 16
0.75 0.0 0.75 # 17
0.75 0.75 0.0 # 18
0.0 0.75 0.75 # 19
0.5 0.5 0.5 # 20
0.25 0.5 0.25 # 21
0.25 0.25 0.5 # 22
0.5 0.25 0.25 # 23
0.25 0.5 0.75 # 24
0.75 0.25 0.5 # 25
0.5 0.75 0.25 # 26
0.75 0.5 0.25 # 27
0.25 0.75 0.5 # 28
0.5 0.25 0.75 # 29
0.75 0.5 0.75 # 30
0.75 0.75 0.5 # 31
0.5 0.75 0.75 # 32

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

Re: POSCAR for extended solids

#5 Post by alex » Fri Nov 25, 2016 9:46 am

Hi Al,

your 1x1 should look like this

Cu
1.00000000000000
4.0500000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 4.0500000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 4.0500000000000000
4
Direct
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000

Cartesian does not make sense in your case. If you write it like that, it would be 'direct'.
There is no double occupation (like 0 0 0 and 1 1 1 is the _same_ position for fractional coordinates: translational symmetry!), too.

However, the 2x2 is alright! If you'd like to have a smaller super cell, you could go for multiples of the primitive fcc, which contains a single atom only.

Cheers,

alex

Post Reply