Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am
Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
Dear Users,
I am trying to calculate real and imaginary part of dielectric function using
LOPTICS tag. But in the output for Imaginary part and real part, I am getting 0 and 1 respectively. And at the end,
" The outermost node in the dielectric function lies at epsilon= -1.0 "
this is printing.
For your reference, I am attaching inputs and output (vasprun.xml and OUTCAR). Please help me out.
---
Chandan
I am trying to calculate real and imaginary part of dielectric function using
LOPTICS tag. But in the output for Imaginary part and real part, I am getting 0 and 1 respectively. And at the end,
" The outermost node in the dielectric function lies at epsilon= -1.0 "
this is printing.
For your reference, I am attaching inputs and output (vasprun.xml and OUTCAR). Please help me out.
---
Chandan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am
Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
Dear Alexey,
Thank you for your reply.
I reduced the SIGMA to 0.05 and, it worked!!
But, The plot is not smooth. How can I smooth the curve for publishable results.
---
Chandan
Thank you for your reply.
I reduced the SIGMA to 0.05 and, it worked!!
But, The plot is not smooth. How can I smooth the curve for publishable results.
---
Chandan
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am
Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
Dear Alexey,
Thank you for your reply.
As I tried the tetrahedron method (ISMEAR = -5), but it printed the following error,
"Integration of the imaginary part of the dielectric function by means of the tetrahedron method is not supported for metallic systems."
Apart from this, I also tried to repeat the same calculation for hetrostructure and for that case same issue is there even I tried to reduce the SIGMA to 0.05.
Please comment on the same in details so that I can rectify the problem by myself.
---
Regards
Chandan
Thank you for your reply.
As I tried the tetrahedron method (ISMEAR = -5), but it printed the following error,
"Integration of the imaginary part of the dielectric function by means of the tetrahedron method is not supported for metallic systems."
Apart from this, I also tried to repeat the same calculation for hetrostructure and for that case same issue is there even I tried to reduce the SIGMA to 0.05.
Please comment on the same in details so that I can rectify the problem by myself.
---
Regards
Chandan
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2021 12:45 pm
Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
This error again is related to the fact that some of the orbitals are partially occupied.
Sorry, my previous answer might have been misleading. The broadening of the dielectric function is determined by the complex shift CSHIFT, so you can get a larger broadening of the dielectric function with ISMEAR=0 by increasing CSHIFT.
Sorry, my previous answer might have been misleading. The broadening of the dielectric function is determined by the complex shift CSHIFT, so you can get a larger broadening of the dielectric function with ISMEAR=0 by increasing CSHIFT.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 7:56 am
Re: Problem with real and imaginary part of dielectric functions
Dear Alexey,
Thank you for your reply.
it worked!!
---
Chandan
Thank you for your reply.
it worked!!
---
Chandan