Hi
I have a problem. I try to calculate both CeO2 and SmO2, both bulk, using PBE. With the same INCAR, POSCAR, and KPOINTS files CeO2 converges nice and rapid, but for SmO2 everything goes wrong. I am kicked out in the first electronic loop and gets the errors: ZPOTRF failed, and error ZHEGV
the INCAR looks like:
System = Sm02 fluorite
ISTART = 0 ! start from scratch
#Ionic relaxation
NSW = 0 ! maximum number of ionic steps
#ISIF = 2 ! relax ions only
#IBRION = 2 ! C-G algorithm
#EDIFFG = -1E-2 ! forces less than 0.01eV/A
#electronic relaxation
NELM = 40 ! max nuber electronic steps
NELMIN = 8 ! min number electronic steps
IALGO = 38 ! Blocked Davidsson
ENCUT = 600 ! ev cut off
Anyone knows what I am doing wrong?
Best
M.
Problem with Sm
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
Problem with Sm
Last edited by mattis on Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
Problem with Sm
Please check if it works if you use the Sm_3 PP (the Sm f-electrons frozen in the core).
Last edited by admin on Wed Jun 20, 2007 10:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Problem with Sm
PBE Sm_3 worked fine for SmO2!
But why is it that for example Ce and Pr works with +4 potentials in REO2 while Sm does not?
In case of a +4 potential all of them should adopt a +3 valence anyway right?
Thanks.
M.
But why is it that for example Ce and Pr works with +4 potentials in REO2 while Sm does not?
In case of a +4 potential all of them should adopt a +3 valence anyway right?
Thanks.
M.
Last edited by mattis on Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.