First a general question-
This question has been addressed before, but I'm not clear on the answer. How can I check how close a calculation is to convergence?
More specifically-
I have run an NEB calculation with 3 images, and it converged. I added four additional images by linearly interpolating between the images and between the images and the end points. Image 01 has moved such that it is almost exactly image 00. Image 00 is more stable by approximately 0.04 eV. The calculation ran out of time at about 100 cycles and I want to restart it, but I want to know what to do about image 01. Should I remove it, or make a new one linearly interpolated between 00 and 02?
Thanks,
Matt
more NEB
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:37 pm
more NEB
Follow up: I gave the calculation a few more cycles and image 01 became more stable than 00. I did a geometry optimization on that, and it radically reoriented the molecules and was much more stable than 00. It looks like this pathway isn't valid. If anyone can still answer my fist question, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Matt
Last edited by mhyman on Mon Aug 08, 2005 5:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 3:53 am
- License Nr.: 866
- Location: U.S.
more NEB
About your first question, I usually do as follows:
After finishing the calculation with 3 images, interpolate the two end points by 7 immediate POSCARs. Then replace the POSCARs in 02 04 06 with CONTCAR in the previous 3 images. That's say, using the converged 3 images for the continuing calculation.
As for the 2nd question, one possibility is that your image 00 is not the globle mimina, since image 01 is more stable than image 00. If the activation energy between 00 and 01 is very small, the MEP will go like that.
After finishing the calculation with 3 images, interpolate the two end points by 7 immediate POSCARs. Then replace the POSCARs in 02 04 06 with CONTCAR in the previous 3 images. That's say, using the converged 3 images for the continuing calculation.
As for the 2nd question, one possibility is that your image 00 is not the globle mimina, since image 01 is more stable than image 00. If the activation energy between 00 and 01 is very small, the MEP will go like that.
Last edited by Brane on Wed Aug 10, 2005 12:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:37 pm
more NEB
Thanks for the reply, but I guess I wasn't all that clear in my question. If I have a NEB calculation running, how do I check to see how close it is to converging? Is there a line in the output that I can check?
Thanks,
Matt
Thanks,
Matt
Last edited by mhyman on Thu Aug 11, 2005 2:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:54 pm
- License Nr.: 80+Upaw
more NEB
To see how close your NEB run is to converging-- run "nebef.pl" from within the directory that contains the images for your job. The second column from the left [of the output of nebef.pl] can be compared to what you set for EDIFFG (I'm assuming a negative value in INCAR for EDIFFG).
The website for NEB (at least the NEB version I use and I assume you use) discusses nebef.pl at the below website
http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vasp/scripts/
Also the above website has a link to the NEB forum, I have found posting NEB questions to that forum helps.
The website for NEB (at least the NEB version I use and I assume you use) discusses nebef.pl at the below website
http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vasp/scripts/
Also the above website has a link to the NEB forum, I have found posting NEB questions to that forum helps.
Last edited by vasp_user on Thu Oct 24, 2013 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.