values in LOCPOT file

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
rgc
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:25 pm

values in LOCPOT file

#1 Post by rgc » Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:26 pm

1- Are the values in the LOCPOT file multiplied by the volume of the cell, like in CHGCAR?

2- Are all the values multiplied by -1, with respect to the usual definition of the electrostatic potential? I think they are, but could anyone confirm this?

3- Are the two blocks printed always identical? (in CHGCAR, the two blocks are for the charge and for the spin density. In LOCPOT only one is necessary but two are printed...)

Thanks!
Last edited by rgc on Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

yuxiao_zihan
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:18 pm
Location: ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France
Contact:

values in LOCPOT file

#2 Post by yuxiao_zihan » Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:49 am

As I understand, in LOCPOT, all the values is electrostatic potential. You do not need to multiply by the volume or -1. This is what I did for work function.
Last edited by yuxiao_zihan on Tue Feb 17, 2009 8:49 am, edited 1 time in total.

rgc
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:25 pm

values in LOCPOT file

#3 Post by rgc » Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:24 pm

Thanks, Yuxiao. But I think that if you compare the Fermi energy with the values in LOCPOT, that actually means that these values are energies, not potentials, that is:

E=e*Pot=-1*Pot

where e=-1 is the electron charge. Don't you think?

I guessed that the potential was multiplied by -1 because I calculated the electrostatic potential above a surface, and the values in LOCPOT are more positive around the negative ions, and less positive around the cations. The opposite is expected...
Last edited by rgc on Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

yuxiao_zihan
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:18 pm
Location: ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France
Contact:

values in LOCPOT file

#4 Post by yuxiao_zihan » Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:38 pm

If you calculate the surface, have you tried to get the vacuum level above the surface? Compared to Fermi energy, maybe you could find that it is potential.
Last edited by yuxiao_zihan on Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply