strange band occupation

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
giacomo giorgi
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:04 am

strange band occupation

#1 Post by giacomo giorgi » Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:55 am

Dear all,
I am experiencing something that sounds strange (wrong, I guess).

I have a 8 atom cell of GaAs. I replace 1 Ga and 1 As with two Ge atoms and I do spinpolarized calc (ISPIN=2) keeping in mind that in my system there are 82 electrons.

The following is the INCAR

SYSTEM=GaAs
ISTART=1
ISMEAR=0
PREC=Med
ADDGRID=.True.
ISIF=3
NSW=300
IBRION=1
EDIFF=1E-5
EDIFFG=-0.01
GGA=91
ISPIN=2
ENCUT=287.594
ENAUG=531.356



I do band calculation with this INCAR
ISPIN=2
NUPDOWN=0
ISTART=1
LREAL=TRUE
PREC=Med
ICHARG=11
EDIFFG=-0.05
EDIFF=1E-5
GGA=91
ENCUT=287.594
ENAUG=531.356
NWRITE = 2
INIWAV = 1 electr: 0-lowe 1-rand 2-diag
NELMDL = -7
NELM = 90
NELMIN = 10
WEIMIN = 0
LMAXMIX = 6
ALGO =F
IALGO = 48
NSIM = 1 NSIM bands are optimized simultaneously (IALGO=48 only)
LCHARG = .TRUE.
LWAVE = .TRUE.
LELF = .TRUE.
IBRION = -1
ISIF = 3
ISYM = 1
POTIM = 0.1
LORBIT = 12
ISMEAR = 1 (-1-Fermi, 1-Methfessel/Paxton)
SIGMA = 0.02 broadening in eV
NPAR = 1
LPLANE= .TRUE.


and when I check my OUTCAR I see that:


E-fermi : 2.7302 XC(G=0): -9.4599 alpha+bet : -8.3138
add alpha+bet to get absolut eigen values

spin component 1

k-point 1 : 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500
band No. band energies occupation
1 -22.2938 1.00000
......
......
.....
38 0.3681 1.00000
39 2.3121 1.00000
40 2.6090 1.00000
41 2.7235 0.54911
42 2.7235 0.54896
43 3.6999 0.00000
44 3.6999 0.00000
....
....

So it seems that one electron, even if ISPIN=2, is shared by two bands. (Same behavior of course for beta)
Where am I wrong?
thanks,
G
Last edited by giacomo giorgi on Thu Mar 19, 2009 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

strange band occupation

#2 Post by admin » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:34 pm

the two states are degenerate in energy. If this degeneracy is not lifted, the electron has to be 'shared'
Last edited by admin on Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

giacomo giorgi
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 2:04 am

strange band occupation

#3 Post by giacomo giorgi » Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:51 am

Dear admin,
thanks a lot. But let me harass you once more. Technically, you mean lifting degeneracy by imposing fermi temperature = 0 (ISMEAR=-1
SIGMA=0.0)?
Because I also did it but results were not encouraging (tremendously slow convergence).

Still many thanks,
G
Last edited by giacomo giorgi on Sun Mar 22, 2009 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

strange band occupation

#4 Post by admin » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:21 am

The degeneracy of the states most probably is due to the symmetry of your cell. If the space group of the cell allows for degenerate states, you will not get rid of them by decreasing SIGMA because some of the eigenstates of your system simply are degenerate (let me remind you of the d eg-t2gsplitting or the 3-fold degeneracy of p-states of cubic systems, for example).
Please check for the symmetry information as written in OUTCAR.
Last edited by admin on Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply