Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
riche

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#1 Post by riche » Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:11 pm

Dear all,
I have a problem in reproducing the bandstructure of Al by 4 atomic supercell.
First, I used 1 atomic supercell, and the resulting bandstructure agrees well with the literature. But I couldn't use 4 atomic supercell to reproduce the same results.
The k-points along high symmetry lines are exactly the same in the calculations of 1 and 4 atomic supercells as indicated in the OUTCAR files. To be specific, the k-points scaled by 2pi/a printed in the OUTCAR files are exactly the same.
Does anyone have any idea what is going on?
Thank you very much and best wishes!
Last edited by riche on Thu Feb 24, 2011 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#2 Post by alex » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm

The trap you took is called Brillouin zone folding. bands are folded back into a smaller reciprocal cell.

Hth

alex
Last edited by alex on Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

riche

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#3 Post by riche » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:37 pm

Dear all,
This is just a very stupid mistake. How is it even possible for the results to be the same? I guess I figured out what I need to do.
Last edited by riche on Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

riche

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#4 Post by riche » Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:40 pm

Dear Alex,
Thank you very much for your answer. How did I just forget the basics?
Thanks again and best wishes!

<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Thu Feb 24 2011, 07:48PM ]</span>
Last edited by riche on Thu Feb 24, 2011 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

alex
Hero Member
Hero Member
Posts: 585
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:21 pm
License Nr.: 5-67
Location: Germany

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#5 Post by alex » Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:37 am

:-) happens from time to time to myself, too. My trick is to go back a step and take a look again later.

Cheers,

alex
Last edited by alex on Fri Feb 25, 2011 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

vaspfonda
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:54 am

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#6 Post by vaspfonda » Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:15 pm

I have a related question regarding the zone folding. The band of double unit cell in one dimensional structure is supposed to be similar to that of single unit cell simply by zone-folding (Pi/2a, Pi/a) to (0, Pi/2a). The eigenvalues should be the same. But I found some energy levels close to EF are shifted. Is this normal? Or I did something wrong?
Last edited by vaspfonda on Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

sumanali
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:52 am

Difference in the bandstructure of fcc Al by 1 and 4 atomic supercells

#7 Post by sumanali » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:57 am

Thank you for your answer dear lumacido. i think the kpoints you suggested can be used for relaxation of the surfaces. But as far as i know, i need to use specific kpoint coordinates to find a surface's band structure. For example 111 surface needs to set Gamma - M - K points and they have different coordinates.

____________________
http://www.braindumps.com/CCNA-Voice.htm
http://www.citrix.com/
http://www.wisc.edu/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brescia_University
http://www.youtube.com/user/VideoISCEvents
https://www.facebook.com/avaya

<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Thu Jul 24 2014, 11:47AM ]</span>
Last edited by sumanali on Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
pass4sure pass 4 sure
pass4sure 000-421 pass4sure 000-421
pass4sure 000-667 pass4sure 000-667
pass4sure 000-540 pass4sure 000-540

Post Reply