about the formation energy calculated by vasp
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:51 pm
Hi, every one,
I have a question want to consult. I'm using vasp to calculate the formation energy of N doped semiconductor, but the total energy difference of neutral states and charged states seems unreasonable. It's too large.
A 3*3*3 supercell were used. One O atom was substituted by N atom.
All the atoms positions were relaxed.
For neutral states, the total energy of the doped system is -648.481449. However, for minus one (-1) states, the total energy of the doped system is -643.658924.
For minus one (-1), I just set the parameter NELECT to be one more electron larger than the neutral states and the ions were relaxed with the lattice parameter unchanged. I noted the fermi level of the neutral system is 4.6823 eV.
In all our calculations ,PBE pseudopotentials and GGA+U were used.
I don?t know why there is so large energy difference, about 4.82eV, between the neutral states and (-1) charged states. I'm puzzled by this question for a long time. If you have any idea , could you give me some advice? I am great grateful for your help.
look forward to your reply. thanks in advance.
PS, INCAR file is as follows:
NWRITE = 2 # verbosity write-tag(how much is written)
PREC = Normal
ISTART = 0 # startjob 0=new 1=cont 2=samecut
ISPIN = 2 # spin polarized calculation (2=yes,1=no)
INIWAV = 1 # initial electr wf 0=lowe 1=rand
ENCUT = 450.0 eV
EDIFF = 1.0E-06
NSW = 0 # number of steps for ionic upd
IBRION = -1 # ionic relaxation 0=MD 1=quasi-New 2=CG
ISIF = 2
ISMEAR = 0 # partial occupancies -5=Blochl(energy) -4=tet -1=fermi 0=gaussian >0 MP(force)
SIGMA = 0.05
LORBIT = 11 # 0 simple, 1 ext, 2 COOP (PROOUT)
# NELECT = 702.0000
#plus U
LDAU=.TRUE.
LDAUTYPE=2
LDAUL= -1 -1 -1 2
LDAUU=0.00 0.00 0.00 5.2
LDAUPRINT=2
LMAXMIX=4
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
I have a question want to consult. I'm using vasp to calculate the formation energy of N doped semiconductor, but the total energy difference of neutral states and charged states seems unreasonable. It's too large.
A 3*3*3 supercell were used. One O atom was substituted by N atom.
All the atoms positions were relaxed.
For neutral states, the total energy of the doped system is -648.481449. However, for minus one (-1) states, the total energy of the doped system is -643.658924.
For minus one (-1), I just set the parameter NELECT to be one more electron larger than the neutral states and the ions were relaxed with the lattice parameter unchanged. I noted the fermi level of the neutral system is 4.6823 eV.
In all our calculations ,PBE pseudopotentials and GGA+U were used.
I don?t know why there is so large energy difference, about 4.82eV, between the neutral states and (-1) charged states. I'm puzzled by this question for a long time. If you have any idea , could you give me some advice? I am great grateful for your help.
look forward to your reply. thanks in advance.
PS, INCAR file is as follows:
NWRITE = 2 # verbosity write-tag(how much is written)
PREC = Normal
ISTART = 0 # startjob 0=new 1=cont 2=samecut
ISPIN = 2 # spin polarized calculation (2=yes,1=no)
INIWAV = 1 # initial electr wf 0=lowe 1=rand
ENCUT = 450.0 eV
EDIFF = 1.0E-06
NSW = 0 # number of steps for ionic upd
IBRION = -1 # ionic relaxation 0=MD 1=quasi-New 2=CG
ISIF = 2
ISMEAR = 0 # partial occupancies -5=Blochl(energy) -4=tet -1=fermi 0=gaussian >0 MP(force)
SIGMA = 0.05
LORBIT = 11 # 0 simple, 1 ext, 2 COOP (PROOUT)
# NELECT = 702.0000
#plus U
LDAU=.TRUE.
LDAUTYPE=2
LDAUL= -1 -1 -1 2
LDAUU=0.00 0.00 0.00 5.2
LDAUPRINT=2
LMAXMIX=4
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>