Does the ionic convergence depend on NSW?
Posted: Sat Dec 12, 2020 7:29 pm
Dear Forum;
In a relaxation run, for a clean W(001) surface under an external
electrostatic field, the program stopped after 20 ionic steps giving:
"ZBRENT: fatal error in bracketing
please rerun with smaller EDIFF, or copy CONTCAR to POSCAR and continue"
After such an error the program doesn't update the wavefunctions and
charge density. Therefore, I re-submitted the job with NSW= 19 (using
the *same* input files) in order to generate new WAVECAR and CHGCAR and
then copy CONTCAR to POSCAR and continue.
However, the calculation converged (!) after 18 ionic steps. How it can
be?
As you'll see in the attached plot the total energies, for the two runs,
are the same in the first five ionic steps and then differ.
Thank you, looking forward to your answer at your earliest convenience.
Best Regards,
Naoum Bacalis
In a relaxation run, for a clean W(001) surface under an external
electrostatic field, the program stopped after 20 ionic steps giving:
"ZBRENT: fatal error in bracketing
please rerun with smaller EDIFF, or copy CONTCAR to POSCAR and continue"
After such an error the program doesn't update the wavefunctions and
charge density. Therefore, I re-submitted the job with NSW= 19 (using
the *same* input files) in order to generate new WAVECAR and CHGCAR and
then copy CONTCAR to POSCAR and continue.
However, the calculation converged (!) after 18 ionic steps. How it can
be?
As you'll see in the attached plot the total energies, for the two runs,
are the same in the first five ionic steps and then differ.
Thank you, looking forward to your answer at your earliest convenience.
Best Regards,
Naoum Bacalis