about transition state and frequence

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
fegg7502

about transition state and frequence

#1 Post by fegg7502 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:01 am

Dear all.
i have a problem when i calculate the frequence and transition state. There are always several f/i when i calculate the frequence with a relaxed
structure, while there is no f/i when i calculate the frequence with the NEB transition state result.

the incars are as listed here:
SYSTEM =
ENCUT = 400
ISTART = 0 ; ICHARG=2

ISMEAR = 2 ; SIGMA = 0.2
ISIF = 2

IBRION = 5
POTIM = 0.024
NFREE = 2
NSW =400
PREC = HIGH
EDIFF = 0.000001




SYSTEM =

ISTART = 0 ; ICHARG=2

ISMEAR = 2 ; SIGMA = 0.2

ISPIN = 2

IMAGES = 4

SPRING = -5

IALGO = 48

ENCUT = 400

dynamic:

IBRION = 1

NSW = 400

NFREE = 2

POTIM = 0.2
Last edited by fegg7502 on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

about transition state and frequence

#2 Post by admin » Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:17 pm

I suppose that you use INCAR1for both calculations of the vibrational spectrum, and INCAR2 for the NEB run only, do you?
please check:
-- does the TS really correspond to the geometry with the maximum total energy along the reaction path?
-- are all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to 10-6 or did some of the steps simply finish after 60 electronic scf steps without being actually converged
-- usually, POTIM should even be chosen smaller in INCAR1 (0.01 to 0.015) to make sure that you are in the harmonic limit
Last edited by admin on Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

fegg7502

about transition state and frequence

#3 Post by fegg7502 » Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:59 pm

the TS really correspond to the geometry with the maximum total energy along the reaction path

all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to the defult value
Last edited by fegg7502 on Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

camilo
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:29 pm

about transition state and frequence

#4 Post by camilo » Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:09 am

Isn't there some concern that basis set incompleteness makes a small POTIM a bad idea?
Last edited by camilo on Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply