Can direct coordinates be nagative? CONTCAR shows it
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:41 am
Dear Vasp Users
I am relaxing internal coordinates of a system. My POSCAR file contains the DIRECT coordinates (between 0 and 1). After certain steps of ionic relaxation the CONTCAR is written. This CONTCAR shows negative coordinates as well like this
Staring coordinates
0.00106166 0.00106166 0.35832663 T T T
0.99893834 0.99893834 0.64167337 T T T
relaxed ones
0.0005738272305676 0.0005738272305676 0.3566378879904804 T T T
-0.0005738272305677 -0.0005738272305677 0.6433621120095198 T T T
I did not expect the negative sign, as direct coordinates are always between 0 and 1.
But then I continued without editing my CONTCAR file , I reached the structural minima.
My question is am I doing something wrong by not editing the CONTCAR file or is it acceptable?
Ofcourse I notice the fact that 0.001 and 0.999 can be related by translational symmetry.
I would be thankful for any suggestion or experiences in this matter.
Regards
Narasimham
I am relaxing internal coordinates of a system. My POSCAR file contains the DIRECT coordinates (between 0 and 1). After certain steps of ionic relaxation the CONTCAR is written. This CONTCAR shows negative coordinates as well like this
Staring coordinates
0.00106166 0.00106166 0.35832663 T T T
0.99893834 0.99893834 0.64167337 T T T
relaxed ones
0.0005738272305676 0.0005738272305676 0.3566378879904804 T T T
-0.0005738272305677 -0.0005738272305677 0.6433621120095198 T T T
I did not expect the negative sign, as direct coordinates are always between 0 and 1.
But then I continued without editing my CONTCAR file , I reached the structural minima.
My question is am I doing something wrong by not editing the CONTCAR file or is it acceptable?
Ofcourse I notice the fact that 0.001 and 0.999 can be related by translational symmetry.
I would be thankful for any suggestion or experiences in this matter.
Regards
Narasimham