Question regarding MD: ENCUT & SMASS
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:27 pm
Dear All
I would like to do (NVT) MD on a system containing H2O and a TM oxide. I have the following questions:
1) Will it be correct to do MD with default ENCUT for the equilibration run and then change the ENCUT to higher value for the production run? or one has to use higher ENCUT from staring?
2) In the electronic convergence its by default going to E-04. While running MD, if the NELM exceeds (does not reach E-04) are we forced to stop and do the MD again or is it acceptable ? lets say in the initial iterations.
2) A similar type of MD was done in this paper using VASP: J. Carrasco et.al, PRL 100 , 016101 (2008). The authors have used nose mass parameter = 24.3 E-27 a.u. But when I do MD with SMASS=1 , the nose mass parameter in OUTCAR is 0.540E-27a.u.
a) Is there a formula wherein I can check the SMASS value for 24.3 E-27 a.u.?
b) by using SMASS =1, In general can one get the dynamics right as compared to a higher SMASS value?
c) Is a higher value of SMASS more good in retaining a canonical ensemble?
I have read previous post and realize that there is no as such thumb rule for SMASS in NVT (if I am not wrong). But still I will be thankful and glad if some one share his/her experience in choosing SMASS.
Regards
Narasimham
I would like to do (NVT) MD on a system containing H2O and a TM oxide. I have the following questions:
1) Will it be correct to do MD with default ENCUT for the equilibration run and then change the ENCUT to higher value for the production run? or one has to use higher ENCUT from staring?
2) In the electronic convergence its by default going to E-04. While running MD, if the NELM exceeds (does not reach E-04) are we forced to stop and do the MD again or is it acceptable ? lets say in the initial iterations.
2) A similar type of MD was done in this paper using VASP: J. Carrasco et.al, PRL 100 , 016101 (2008). The authors have used nose mass parameter = 24.3 E-27 a.u. But when I do MD with SMASS=1 , the nose mass parameter in OUTCAR is 0.540E-27a.u.
a) Is there a formula wherein I can check the SMASS value for 24.3 E-27 a.u.?
b) by using SMASS =1, In general can one get the dynamics right as compared to a higher SMASS value?
c) Is a higher value of SMASS more good in retaining a canonical ensemble?
I have read previous post and realize that there is no as such thumb rule for SMASS in NVT (if I am not wrong). But still I will be thankful and glad if some one share his/her experience in choosing SMASS.
Regards
Narasimham