Page 1 of 1
Energy minima vs Pressure minima
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 9:19 am
by rpf
Hi Friends,
During the geometry optimization in VASP, I see that energy minima and pressure minima DO NOT occurs at same lattice constant (there is a small difference between them). What is the reason for this situation
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Energy minima vs Pressure minima
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:19 am
by forsdan
Well, the pressure is evaluated from the stress tensor and the stress tensor requires a high energy cutoff and prec=accurate in order to be evaluated accurately. So probably your cutoff energy and/or prec is too low. For very accurate total energy evaluation you should also use ISMEAR = -5.
So increase your cutoff at least 30%, set prec=accurate and switch on ISMEAR=-5. Then compare again. If there still is a difference then gradually increase the cutoff energy until the difference disappear.
Cheers,
/Dan
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Thu Mar 11 2010, 11:27AM ]</span>
Energy minima vs Pressure minima
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:48 pm
by rpf
it is fixed by increasing the cutoff and setting prec = accurate...
thank you very much
Energy minima vs Pressure minima
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:49 am
by admin
please let me add one note: when optimizing the structure of a cell automatically (ISIF), the FFT-grids are determined at the beginning of the vasp run and not adjusted during the run. Therefore, if the starting geometry (volume, cell shape) is far away from the equilibrium, one should do the optimization step-wise (NSW 3-5) at the beginning (mv CONTCAR to POSCAR, but delete WAVECAR), such that the FFT-grids are adjusted to the cell ceometries during relaxation. Please have a look at accuracy.pdf of the vasp-workshop (
http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-workshop tutorials and session talks) for further information on that issue