PBE paw used in PBE calculation of PdO
Posted: Fri May 13, 2011 2:50 pm
I have tried a optimisation calculation on PdO system using PBE+U with PBE paw data. I have tested it with U values from 0 - 6. But the resulting energy seems to be rubbish with U values >=2. But this didn't happen using PW91+U method with PW91 paw data and also PBE+U method with PW91 paw data.
I have used both the Pd_new and Pd_pv_new PAW data for the calculation in PBE+U.
The incar i used for the PBE+U calculation is as follow and it is similar to the PW91+U calculation
SYSTEM PdO_bulk
ENCUT = 500
PREC = High
ICHARG = 2 !Start of with atomic densities
IBRION = 2 !Conjugate-gradient
ISIF = 2 !Relax atoms not cell
ISPIN = 2 !Spin polarised
NSW = 40 !Nr of ionic steps
GGA = PE !PBE
EDIFFG = -0.01 ! check the convergence gradient is less than that if yes then stop
LDAU = .TRUE.
LDAUTYPE = 2 !dudarev et al method Ueff=(U-J)
LDAUL = 2 -1
LDAUU = 6.0 0.0
LDAUJ = 0.0 0.0
LDAUPRINT = 1
The summary of converged energy extracted from OUTCAR
for U=1; Final converged energy= -22.275926;
for U=2; Final converged energy= -8720.997228;
for U=3; Final converged energy= -23596.246960;
for U=4; Final converged energy= -30557.299718;
for U=5; Final converged energy= -38486.763015;
for U=6; Final converged energy= -46418.012462;
from the OUTCAR for U=2,
I have notice the 'eigenvalues EBANDS = 13.62680413' which then in the next step jumped to 'eigenvalues EBANDS = -143.58904424' and became more and more negative in subsequent steps.
Has anyone encounter this problem before? Does anyone know what causes this?
Thanks in advance
Scott
I have used both the Pd_new and Pd_pv_new PAW data for the calculation in PBE+U.
The incar i used for the PBE+U calculation is as follow and it is similar to the PW91+U calculation
SYSTEM PdO_bulk
ENCUT = 500
PREC = High
ICHARG = 2 !Start of with atomic densities
IBRION = 2 !Conjugate-gradient
ISIF = 2 !Relax atoms not cell
ISPIN = 2 !Spin polarised
NSW = 40 !Nr of ionic steps
GGA = PE !PBE
EDIFFG = -0.01 ! check the convergence gradient is less than that if yes then stop
LDAU = .TRUE.
LDAUTYPE = 2 !dudarev et al method Ueff=(U-J)
LDAUL = 2 -1
LDAUU = 6.0 0.0
LDAUJ = 0.0 0.0
LDAUPRINT = 1
The summary of converged energy extracted from OUTCAR
for U=1; Final converged energy= -22.275926;
for U=2; Final converged energy= -8720.997228;
for U=3; Final converged energy= -23596.246960;
for U=4; Final converged energy= -30557.299718;
for U=5; Final converged energy= -38486.763015;
for U=6; Final converged energy= -46418.012462;
from the OUTCAR for U=2,
I have notice the 'eigenvalues EBANDS = 13.62680413' which then in the next step jumped to 'eigenvalues EBANDS = -143.58904424' and became more and more negative in subsequent steps.
Has anyone encounter this problem before? Does anyone know what causes this?
Thanks in advance
Scott