Manganese in AFM fcc configuration
Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:42 pm
Dear all,
in order to calculate the chemical potential of Manganese, I took into account the AFM configuration of the system in its fcc configuration.
The unit cell of this alpha-Mn is consituted by 58 atoms.
In my INCAR I set
SYSTEM = a-Mn
# xc
GGA = PE
VOSKOWN = 1
ISTART = 1
#electronic relaxation
LREAL = Auto
PREC= High
ENCUT= 500.0 eV
ENAUG= 605.4 eV
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
#electronic RELAXATION
NELMIN = 4
NELM = 200
ISIF = 3
ISPIN=2
MAGMOM=29*1.5 29*-1.5
ICHARG=1
IBRION = 1
#accuracy of the calculation
EDIFF = 1.E-5
EDIFFG = -0.005 ! inizialmente -0.004
#ionic steps
NSW = 500
AMIX = 0.2
BMIX = 0.00001
AMIX_MAG = 0.8
BMIX_MAG = 0.00001
LORBIT = 11
In the OUTCAR I check the magnetization and I observe that
magnetization (x)
# of ion s p d tot
----------------------------------------
1 0.016 0.017 2.370 2.403
2 0.004 0.002 0.636 0.641
3 0.002 0.001 0.336 0.339
4 0.002 0.001 0.339 0.342
5 0.002 0.001 0.342 0.345
6 0.002 0.001 0.335 0.339
7 0.004 0.002 0.622 0.627
8 0.004 0.002 0.653 0.659
9 0.004 0.002 0.634 0.639
10 0.004 0.002 0.650 0.656
11 0.000 -0.002 -0.061 -0.063
12 0.000 -0.002 -0.063 -0.065
13 -0.001 -0.002 -0.072 -0.075
14 -0.001 -0.002 -0.069 -0.071
15 -0.001 -0.002 -0.081 -0.084
16 -0.001 -0.002 -0.086 -0.088
17 -0.001 -0.002 -0.103 -0.106
18 -0.001 -0.002 -0.104 -0.107
19 -0.001 -0.002 -0.105 -0.108
20 -0.001 -0.002 -0.094 -0.097
21 -0.001 -0.002 -0.107 -0.110
22 -0.001 -0.002 -0.090 -0.093
23 -0.001 -0.003 -0.136 -0.140
24 -0.001 -0.003 -0.138 -0.142
25 -0.002 -0.003 -0.147 -0.151
26 -0.002 -0.003 -0.144 -0.148
27 -0.002 -0.003 -0.162 -0.167
28 -0.002 -0.003 -0.165 -0.169
29 -0.002 -0.003 -0.184 -0.189
30 -0.002 -0.003 -0.187 -0.192
31 -0.002 -0.003 -0.186 -0.191
32 -0.002 -0.003 -0.171 -0.176
33 -0.002 -0.003 -0.189 -0.194
34 -0.002 -0.003 -0.170 -0.175
35 -0.003 -0.006 0.018 0.009
36 -0.003 -0.006 0.015 0.006
37 -0.003 -0.006 0.012 0.003
38 -0.003 -0.006 0.013 0.004
39 -0.003 -0.006 0.022 0.013
40 -0.003 -0.006 0.020 0.012
41 -0.003 -0.006 0.023 0.014
42 -0.003 -0.006 0.021 0.013
43 -0.003 -0.006 0.023 0.014
44 -0.003 -0.006 0.016 0.007
45 -0.003 -0.006 0.020 0.012
46 -0.003 -0.006 0.017 0.008
47 -0.002 -0.003 0.000 -0.004
48 -0.002 -0.003 -0.001 -0.005
49 -0.002 -0.003 -0.005 -0.010
50 -0.002 -0.003 -0.003 -0.008
51 -0.001 -0.003 0.004 -0.001
52 -0.002 -0.003 0.002 -0.003
53 -0.001 -0.003 0.003 -0.001
54 -0.001 -0.003 0.003 -0.002
55 -0.001 -0.003 0.002 -0.002
56 -0.002 -0.003 -0.003 -0.007
57 -0.001 -0.003 0.002 -0.003
58 -0.002 -0.003 -0.001 -0.005
------------------------------------------------
tot -0.036 -0.137 4.124 3.952
Even if I am very new with magnetic systems I understand by myself that there is something of "wrong".....
Could you kindly help me in understanding?
My very best,
Giacomo
in order to calculate the chemical potential of Manganese, I took into account the AFM configuration of the system in its fcc configuration.
The unit cell of this alpha-Mn is consituted by 58 atoms.
In my INCAR I set
SYSTEM = a-Mn
# xc
GGA = PE
VOSKOWN = 1
ISTART = 1
#electronic relaxation
LREAL = Auto
PREC= High
ENCUT= 500.0 eV
ENAUG= 605.4 eV
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
#electronic RELAXATION
NELMIN = 4
NELM = 200
ISIF = 3
ISPIN=2
MAGMOM=29*1.5 29*-1.5
ICHARG=1
IBRION = 1
#accuracy of the calculation
EDIFF = 1.E-5
EDIFFG = -0.005 ! inizialmente -0.004
#ionic steps
NSW = 500
AMIX = 0.2
BMIX = 0.00001
AMIX_MAG = 0.8
BMIX_MAG = 0.00001
LORBIT = 11
In the OUTCAR I check the magnetization and I observe that
magnetization (x)
# of ion s p d tot
----------------------------------------
1 0.016 0.017 2.370 2.403
2 0.004 0.002 0.636 0.641
3 0.002 0.001 0.336 0.339
4 0.002 0.001 0.339 0.342
5 0.002 0.001 0.342 0.345
6 0.002 0.001 0.335 0.339
7 0.004 0.002 0.622 0.627
8 0.004 0.002 0.653 0.659
9 0.004 0.002 0.634 0.639
10 0.004 0.002 0.650 0.656
11 0.000 -0.002 -0.061 -0.063
12 0.000 -0.002 -0.063 -0.065
13 -0.001 -0.002 -0.072 -0.075
14 -0.001 -0.002 -0.069 -0.071
15 -0.001 -0.002 -0.081 -0.084
16 -0.001 -0.002 -0.086 -0.088
17 -0.001 -0.002 -0.103 -0.106
18 -0.001 -0.002 -0.104 -0.107
19 -0.001 -0.002 -0.105 -0.108
20 -0.001 -0.002 -0.094 -0.097
21 -0.001 -0.002 -0.107 -0.110
22 -0.001 -0.002 -0.090 -0.093
23 -0.001 -0.003 -0.136 -0.140
24 -0.001 -0.003 -0.138 -0.142
25 -0.002 -0.003 -0.147 -0.151
26 -0.002 -0.003 -0.144 -0.148
27 -0.002 -0.003 -0.162 -0.167
28 -0.002 -0.003 -0.165 -0.169
29 -0.002 -0.003 -0.184 -0.189
30 -0.002 -0.003 -0.187 -0.192
31 -0.002 -0.003 -0.186 -0.191
32 -0.002 -0.003 -0.171 -0.176
33 -0.002 -0.003 -0.189 -0.194
34 -0.002 -0.003 -0.170 -0.175
35 -0.003 -0.006 0.018 0.009
36 -0.003 -0.006 0.015 0.006
37 -0.003 -0.006 0.012 0.003
38 -0.003 -0.006 0.013 0.004
39 -0.003 -0.006 0.022 0.013
40 -0.003 -0.006 0.020 0.012
41 -0.003 -0.006 0.023 0.014
42 -0.003 -0.006 0.021 0.013
43 -0.003 -0.006 0.023 0.014
44 -0.003 -0.006 0.016 0.007
45 -0.003 -0.006 0.020 0.012
46 -0.003 -0.006 0.017 0.008
47 -0.002 -0.003 0.000 -0.004
48 -0.002 -0.003 -0.001 -0.005
49 -0.002 -0.003 -0.005 -0.010
50 -0.002 -0.003 -0.003 -0.008
51 -0.001 -0.003 0.004 -0.001
52 -0.002 -0.003 0.002 -0.003
53 -0.001 -0.003 0.003 -0.001
54 -0.001 -0.003 0.003 -0.002
55 -0.001 -0.003 0.002 -0.002
56 -0.002 -0.003 -0.003 -0.007
57 -0.001 -0.003 0.002 -0.003
58 -0.002 -0.003 -0.001 -0.005
------------------------------------------------
tot -0.036 -0.137 4.124 3.952
Even if I am very new with magnetic systems I understand by myself that there is something of "wrong".....
Could you kindly help me in understanding?
My very best,
Giacomo