ENCUT AND KPOINTS questions

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
ufo991
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:37 am
License Nr.: 5-872
Location: USTB

ENCUT AND KPOINTS questions

#1 Post by ufo991 » Wed Apr 18, 2018 5:27 am

A pseudo-potential file of vasp has two energy-cutoffs (ENMIN and ENMAX) for the cutoff energy of plane wave. The vasp code does not guarantee the correct results are obtained if the energy-cutoff of plane-wave is smaller than ENIMN or larger than ENMAX. The large ENCUT make plane-wave base-set more completed but loss the accurate of pseudo-potential. There are exceptions that need increasing ENCUT such as in the calculations of stress tensor and the smooth P-V curves, but the ENCUT is still required no larger than 1.2-1.3 ENMAX to assure the correctness of pseudo-potential (See vasp manual) .

For orthorhombic structure, the k-points ixjxk is consistent with the shape of cell in real-space. The k-points mesh is proportional to 1/a,1/b,1/c.

I saw it from someone else. Is it right?

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

Re: ENCUT AND KPOINTS questions

#2 Post by admin » Wed Jul 18, 2018 2:24 pm

the results may be inaccurate if the the cutoff is too small, but increasing the cutoff may ALWAYS improve the results
(you must have misunderstood the manual ENCUT = 1.3* ENMAX is a good compromise to get accurate results
with a reasonably increased basis set size)

Post Reply