Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
Kitaura
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:07 pm
- License Nr.: 756
#1
Post
by Kitaura » Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:58 am
Dear Vasp users.
I'm trying to calculate rare earth metal (Yb, Eu, etc) containing complex using LDA + U.
At the vaps web site, only PBE or GGA-PAW pseudo potentials are available on the rare earth metals.
Can I use the pseudo potentials (GGA-PAW) to calculate electronic structures of the rare earth complexes using LDA + U?
Following is the INCAR files used in my trial calculation.
Any comments and advices are greatly appriciated.
Thanks in advance.
general:
System = Yb materials
ISTART = 0
ICHARG= 2
ENCUT = 500 ! cut-off energy in eV
ISPIN = 1 ! 1 : non
EDIFF = 1E-05
NBANDS = 20
ISMEAR = 0; SIGMA = 0.1;
PREC = Medium
ISIF = 2 ! 2 : dont change cell Vol. and shape
IBRION = 2 ! -1 : ions are not moved, but NSW outer loops are performed.
POTIM = 0.1 ! reduce trial steps
NSW = 0 ! number of ionic steps
AMIX = 0.2
!LDA + U
LDAU = .TRUE.
LDAUTYPE = 2
LDAUL = 3
LDAUU = 5.00
LDAUJ = 0.00
LDAUPRINT = 2
!PAW method parameter
LMAXMIX = 6 ! for f 6, for d 4
!DOS output parameters
EMIN = -5; EMAX = 5; NEDOS = 300
NELMDL = -8
Last edited by
Kitaura on Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
#2
Post
by admin » Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:50 pm
yes, of course, you can take any of the pseudopotentials for an L(S)DA+U calculation.
Last edited by
admin on Tue Jun 17, 2008 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kitaura
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:07 pm
- License Nr.: 756
#3
Post
by Kitaura » Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:56 am
Thank you very much for your fast reply.
I just wonder that LDA + U dose not requires GGA pseudo potentials but LDA PPs.
Last edited by
Kitaura on Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
admin
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
#4
Post
by admin » Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:41 pm
I think there is a small misunderstanding: the tem 'LDA+U' is used in a generalized way here for any XC type you use; the method is not restricted to LDA-potentials only .
Last edited by
admin on Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kitaura
- Newbie
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:07 pm
- License Nr.: 756
#5
Post
by Kitaura » Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:03 pm
Thank you very much.
My doubts was perfectly cleared up.
Last edited by
Kitaura on Wed Jun 18, 2008 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.