hi,
I am looking at H atom on different metal surfaces. In one case, H is 2.14 A from the nearest surface atoms, which to me appears to be a big distance. Is it bound to the surface in spite of this large bond length? The binding energy when referenced to 0.5 *H2 is -1.2eV, which would imply it is, but can someone comment though.
Thanks.
H binding energy
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:09 pm
H binding energy
Last edited by apple on Tue Oct 25, 2011 2:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:42 pm
- License Nr.: 5-813
H binding energy
What algorithm do you apply to optimize the system geometry?
Last edited by Dr Vitaly V. G. Chaban on Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:09 pm
H binding energy
I am using IALGO = 38 , EDIFF= 1E-05, EDIFFG=-1.0E-03. Why should it matter?
Thanks for reply.
Thanks for reply.
Last edited by apple on Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:42 pm
- License Nr.: 5-813
H binding energy
[quote="apple"] Why should it matter?
[/quote]
This matters. If there are parts of system (in its initial POSCAR) which interact relatively weakly, the geometry optimization algorthms give an irrelevant output. In such cases, simulated annealing is preferrable.
Regarding your energy, it seems more or less reasonable to me, but I'd suggest to look through the recent literature. Again, try to reoptimize the geometry using annealing.
[/quote]
This matters. If there are parts of system (in its initial POSCAR) which interact relatively weakly, the geometry optimization algorthms give an irrelevant output. In such cases, simulated annealing is preferrable.
Regarding your energy, it seems more or less reasonable to me, but I'd suggest to look through the recent literature. Again, try to reoptimize the geometry using annealing.
Last edited by Dr Vitaly V. G. Chaban on Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.