problem with 5.3.2 LOPTICS=.TRUE. and KPAR\=1

Problems running VASP: crashes, internal errors, "wrong" results.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
hamelseb
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:31 am

problem with 5.3.2 LOPTICS=.TRUE. and KPAR\=1

#1 Post by hamelseb » Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:37 pm

Hi,

I've been running a comparison between the static calculation without local field correction (LEPSILON=.TRUE.) and the 0-freq limit of LOPTICS=.TRUE.

I find that they agree as long as KPAR = 1
I also find that the value LEPSILON=.TRUE. returns is the same with KPAR\=1
However the value that LOPTICS=.TRUE. returns is different when KPAR\=1

Any thought?

Here's the INCAR file:
SYSTEM = lif
ISTART =1;ICHARG=11
ENCUT = 900
LWAVE = .TRUE.
LCHARG = .TRUE.
PREC = Accurate
NELM = 50
NELMIN = 4
IALGO = 38
KPAR =1
LREAL= .FALSE.
EDIFF=1.0E-8
ISMEAR = -1; SIGMA = 0.0861734300601
WEIMIN=0.0
LOPTICS=.TRUE.
NEDOS=12000
NBANDS=256

OUTCAR with 32 cpu KPAR=1:
frequency dependent REAL DIELECTRIC FUNCTION (independent particle, no local field effects)
E(ev) X Y Z XY YZ ZX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.000000 2.213640 2.213640 2.213640 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

OUTCAR with 32 cpu KPAR=4:
frequency dependent REAL DIELECTRIC FUNCTION (independent particle, no local field effects)
E(ev) X Y Z XY YZ ZX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.000000 1.479533 1.479533 1.479533 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

OUTCAR with 16 cpu KPAR=4:
frequency dependent REAL DIELECTRIC FUNCTION (independent particle, no local field effects)
E(ev) X Y Z XY YZ ZX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.000000 1.479533 1.479533 1.479533 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

Here is the comparison with LEPSILON=.TRUE. with either KPAR=1 or KPAR=4

HEAD OF MICROSCOPIC STATIC DIELECTRIC TENSOR (independent particle, excluding Hartree and local field effects)
------------------------------------------------------
2.214524 0.000000 0.000000
0.000000 2.214524 0.000000
0.000000 0.000000 2.214524
------------------------------------------------------

KPOINTS:
K-Points
0
Gamma
5 5 5
0 0 0

POSCAR:
Li F
3.00000000000000
1.1509157108062773 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 1.1509157108062773 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 1.1509157108062773
Li F
4 4
Direct
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.5000000000000000
Last edited by hamelseb on Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

hamelseb
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:31 am

problem with 5.3.2 LOPTICS=.TRUE. and KPAR\=1

#2 Post by hamelseb » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:40 pm

By the way I tried this with NPAR=1, NPAR=ncpu and NPAR*KPAR=ncpu with KPAR=4 and the results are the same
Last edited by hamelseb on Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

hamelseb
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:31 am

problem with 5.3.2 LOPTICS=.TRUE. and KPAR\=1

#3 Post by hamelseb » Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:44 pm

Oh and if KPAR = 2 we get:

frequency dependent REAL DIELECTRIC FUNCTION (independent particle, no local field effects)
E(ev) X Y Z XY YZ ZX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.000000 1.597323 1.597323 1.597323 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000

which is again different.
Last edited by hamelseb on Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

problem with 5.3.2 LOPTICS=.TRUE. and KPAR\=1

#4 Post by admin » Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:32 pm

we cannot reproduce this behaviour with the latest release of VASP
Last edited by admin on Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply