lm-decomposed DOS

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
hwsheng
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 2:08 pm

lm-decomposed DOS

#1 Post by hwsheng » Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:53 pm

Hello,

I have set up a spin-resolved calculation for a f-electron containing system. The total DOS and the lm-decomposed DOS have been calculated respectively (PAW calculation).

The sum of the lm-decomposed DOS (s,p,d,f, spin-up and spin-down) was found to be greatly smaller than the total DOS. (roughly a fraction of 0.6/1.0). Could someone please explain this difference to me? and how can I get a "reasonable" lm-decomposed DOS?

If RWIG is set manually in INCAR, could this difference be minimized/eliminated?

Thank you for your advice.

Howard Sheng
Last edited by hwsheng on Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

lm-decomposed DOS

#2 Post by admin » Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:42 am

Most probably, the difference of the sums of the local partial DOSs and the total DOS is due to the difference of the sum of the volumes of the 'atomic spheres' and the total volume of the cell.
concerning RWIGS: is you want to set it explicietely in INCAR, please set LORBIT<10 as well, because otherwise the pre-defined values of POTCAR are taken, irrespective of the value you specify in INCAR.
Last edited by admin on Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply