position of atoms in unit cell and structural relaxation

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
hongbiao
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:28 pm
License Nr.: 5-1445

position of atoms in unit cell and structural relaxation

#1 Post by hongbiao » Tue May 24, 2016 6:39 pm

For structural relaxation (ISIF=3) for the unit cell, there are two different ways in terms of the initial positions of atoms in the unit cell: atoms on the high symmetry points, and atoms on the positions slightly adjusted from the high symmetry positions. For the two cases, the relaxed structure and total energy are a little bit different with each other. As the very important step for subsequent calculations, I am wondering which method is more reasonable, or depends? Which parameter should be used to judge the reasonability? Thank you for your help.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

Re: position of atoms in unit cell and structural relaxation

#2 Post by admin » Wed May 25, 2016 9:11 am

You are right with two ways in terms of the initial positions of atoms.
May be the question should be asked in a different way.
Is it necessary to allow the variation of the cell shape when
the symmetry of the structure is well known (from XRD analysis)?

hongbiao
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:28 pm
License Nr.: 5-1445

Re: position of atoms in unit cell and structural relaxation

#3 Post by hongbiao » Wed May 25, 2016 3:37 pm

Yeah, should. Thank you.

hongbiao
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2015 10:28 pm
License Nr.: 5-1445

Re: position of atoms in unit cell and structural relaxation

#4 Post by hongbiao » Wed May 25, 2016 11:28 pm

I have a related question: when you check my another question about structural relaxation, you will find that all the forces in the y direction
are 0, while forces in the x and z directions are too big and not converged. Is this case has something to do with the symmetry? Thank you.

Post Reply