Dear all!
I've got a monoclinic molecular crystal with Br, O, C and H. In order to relax the structure without any modification of the unit cell which criterium do you consider to be more adquate, reducing the energy or decreasing the stress (forces) on atoms? Which values would be more appropiate in either case?.The final goal is to calculate the vibrational spectrum on the optimized geometry
Thanks
Relaxation of the structure. Energy vs stress on atoms criterium
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:49 am
Relaxation of the structure. Energy vs stress on atoms criterium
Last edited by Tomás on Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Tomás
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
Relaxation of the structure. Energy vs stress on atoms criterium
first optimize the structure via stress/force optimization (ISIF=3). Use high precision and increase the E-cutoff to do so. Furthermore, restart from the CONTCAR of a pre-optimized structure (after about 5 ionic steps) without using the WAVECAR (especially if V- and shape change significantly in the first steps) to make sure that there are no basis-set related errors.
To check the quality of the converged results, do 2-3 few E/V
steps for that converged geometry.
To check the quality of the converged results, do 2-3 few E/V
steps for that converged geometry.
Last edited by admin on Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.