Error: VASP.5.4.4 with IBRION = 5 or 7

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
hong_tang1
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:24 pm

Error: VASP.5.4.4 with IBRION = 5 or 7

#1 Post by hong_tang1 » Tue Mar 22, 2022 5:05 am

Dear Master,

I am trying to do phonon calculations with vasp.5.4.4 SCAN functional.
However, I met the following error. Is this because vasp.5.4.4 does not support metagga SCAN for IBRION = 5 or 7 ? Which version of vasp support this calculation? Please see my attached input files.

I appreciate your help very much.

Best,
Hong





Errors:
" You have switched on METAGGA and linear response routines. |
| This combination is currently not supported. |
| If you have selected LOPTICS=.TRUE., VASP will continue but some |
| matrix elements [H,r] are neglected (you might try to use |
| LPEAD=.TRUE. which works irrespective of H). |
| In all other cases VASP will stop now. SOOO sorry... |
| |
| ----> I REFUSE TO CONTINUE WITH THIS SICK JOB ..., BYE!!! <---- | "
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

marie-therese.huebsch
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 12:01 am

Re: Error: VASP.5.4.4 with IBRION = 5 or 7

#2 Post by marie-therese.huebsch » Mon Mar 28, 2022 9:49 am

Dear Hong,

Densitry-functional-perturbation theory (IBRION = 7, and 8) will not work for metaGGAs including the latest version VASP 6.3.0. However, the finite difference approach (IBRION= 5, and 6) works.

As a side remark, there have been several bug fixes for the original implementation of SCAN and rSCAN. Therefore, we would recommend using the latest version VASP 6.3.0 in any case.

Furthermore, forces computed using SCAN tend to be noisy. r2SCAN seems to perform better in this respect.

Finally, do I understand correctly that, in addition to phonons, you are interested in dielectric properties because you set LEPSILON=T?

Kind regards,
Marie-Therese

Post Reply