Dear VASP users,
Recently I did a calculation of core level with VASP4.6, I can not make sure it is right or not, since the final state is more stable than the one of initial state.
I did the calculation as following,
Two separate calculation with ICORELEVEL=1 or 2 for initial and final state respectively.
with ICORELEVEL=2, I switch to Z+1 approximation, and set
CLNT = 5
CLN = 2
CLL = 1
CLZ = 1
for Fe 2p orbital.
As I understand, the tot energy difference is the energy needed to excite an electron. However, here the tot energy of the final state is more stable than the initial one. I am puzzled for long time. Did I made some serious mistake?
Thank you very much.
Best wishes
core level shift calculation
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:18 pm
- Location: ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Contact:
core level shift calculation
Last edited by yuxiao_zihan on Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
core level shift calculation
what do you mean by "Z+1-approximation"?
[ Edited Tue Feb 17 2009, 12:09PM ]
[ Edited Tue Feb 17 2009, 12:09PM ]
Last edited by admin on Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 12:18 pm
- Location: ENS de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Contact:
core level shift calculation
Dear admin,
I think there are two ways to calculate the core level,
One way is to generate a new pseudopotential, similar to Kohler and Kresse's PRB_2004.
The other way is to use another pseudopotential (the one next to the atom, in this case is Co instead of Fe) to simulate the final state. This is what I am doing. Did I misunderstand it?
Thank you again,
Best wishes,
I think there are two ways to calculate the core level,
One way is to generate a new pseudopotential, similar to Kohler and Kresse's PRB_2004.
The other way is to use another pseudopotential (the one next to the atom, in this case is Co instead of Fe) to simulate the final state. This is what I am doing. Did I misunderstand it?
Thank you again,
Best wishes,
Last edited by yuxiao_zihan on Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
core level shift calculation
sorry, if you use a PP with one more valence electron, this does of course not correspond to the shift of a core electron into the CB. you have to follow the approach described in the paper of Köhler and Kresse to calculate CLS
Last edited by admin on Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.