questions on parametes in DOS analysis

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
luke419
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:37 am
License Nr.: 141 (vasp.4.6+paw)

questions on parametes in DOS analysis

#1 Post by luke419 » Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:04 pm

I'd like to know keywords for the analysis of DOS in detail.

1. Should I always use NPAR = 1 for DOS analysis? Is there any case of DOS analysis in which NPAR = 1 is not required?

2. If I analyze semiconducting materials, what parameters should I use for ISMEAR and SIGMA commonly?
How about SIGMA = 0.2 for semiconductor or insulator? It is supposed that narrow sigma (e.g., 0.1) should require much more computation costs.

3. It seems that ISMEAR -5 requires much computational costs but gives more accurate result. Is it right?
In what case is the use of "ISMEAR -5" required espeically?
Can I use it generally for any material(e.g. semiconductor, insulator etc.)?

4. When should I assign the parameters of NBANDS and IMIN, IMAX specifically?


With best regards,


Luke
Last edited by luke419 on Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pkroll
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:48 pm

questions on parametes in DOS analysis

#2 Post by pkroll » Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:57 pm

Many of these questions are answered at least in parts in the manual.
However, you are always advised to gain experience yourself, rather than to rely on some written statements.
So go ahead and test: try out all what you want to do and analyze the differences. This way you may even learn to understand WHY certain parameters have to be chosen as the are.
Last edited by pkroll on Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

panda

questions on parametes in DOS analysis

#3 Post by panda » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:39 pm

I generally vary sigma decreasing from 0.5 to 0.05 or until I reach required force accuracy.

ISMEAR = -5 ISMEAR = 0 ISMEAR = 1 are always tested in my simulations, as are all of the pseudopotentials

I agree that it is best to just keep a well documented notebook and test out many cases and analyze for each case to really understand what is going on rather than just selecting the same parameters for every run and assuming you are doing things correctly
Last edited by panda on Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply