When I use B3LYP to relax the Bulk TiO2, and my INCAR is like this:
SYSTEM =Ti O
ENCUT =400
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA =0.2
EDIFF =1.0E-5
EDIFFG =-1.0E-2
LREAL = AUTO
LSCALU =.FALSE.
ALGO =Damped
LPLANE =.TRUE.
NSIM =4
NELMIN =4
NELMDL = -5
NELM = 60
ISTART =1
IBRION = 1
POTIM =0.4
LWAVE =.FALSE.
LCHARG =.TRUE.
ISIF = 2
ICHARG =1
ISYM =0
ISPIN =2
NSW =400
AEXX =0.2
AGGAX =0.72
AGGAC =0.81
ALDAC =0.19
LHFCALC =.TRUE.
ENCUTFOCK =0
LMAXFOCK = 4
ADDGRID =.TRUE.
NBANDS =128
GGA =B3
NPAR =4
And when I submmit the job to the system ,I also use the Nodes=4 .
But the error as below appear ?What's the matter ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| EEEEEEE RRRRRR RRRRRR OOOOOOO RRRRRR ### ### ### |
| E R R R R O O R R ### ### ### |
| E R R R R O O R R ### ### ### |
| EEEEE RRRRRR RRRRRR O O RRRRRR # # # |
| E R R R R O O R R |
| E R R R R O O R R ### ### ### |
| EEEEEEE R R R R OOOOOOO R R ### ### ### |
| |
| HF is only implemented for NPAR=number of nodes. |
| Otherwise communication between nodes would be required during the |
| calculation of the exchange potential, which would be utterly slow. |
| |
| ----> I REFUSE TO CONTINUE WITH THIS SICK JOB ..., BYE!!! <---- |
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
- VASP001
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:56 pm
- License Nr.: 176, upgraded to paw
- Location: Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
Last edited by VASP001 on Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:25 pm
- License Nr.: 5-82
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
I had the same problem, check the number of processors that you have and multiply by the number of nodes! For me it worked!
Last edited by gbal on Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:14 pm
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
I have a related question: how to calculate site-projected DOS with HF (or HSE06)?
As far as I've understood, to get partial-DOSCAR and PROCAR files, one has to explicitly set NPAR=1 (at least in vasp 4.6). If I do that in vasp 5.2, within a HSE calculation, I get the same error as above ("HF is only implemented for NPAR=number of nodes").
Is there a way out that I've not seen so far?
Thanks!
As far as I've understood, to get partial-DOSCAR and PROCAR files, one has to explicitly set NPAR=1 (at least in vasp 4.6). If I do that in vasp 5.2, within a HSE calculation, I get the same error as above ("HF is only implemented for NPAR=number of nodes").
Is there a way out that I've not seen so far?
Thanks!
Last edited by palippi on Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- VASP001
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:56 pm
- License Nr.: 176, upgraded to paw
- Location: Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
Hi ,palippi ,I think you make a mistake.When you calculate the Dos ,you have read self-consistent CHGCAR ,and set the LORBIT =11,an for the NPAR =12 or 13 ,the NPAR = integer is sported .
You can also refer to the manual P45 as below
"In vasp.4.6 the site projected DOS can be evaluated for LORBIT=10-12, even if NPAR is not equal 1 (contrary to
previous releases). "
Best wishes.
You can also refer to the manual P45 as below
"In vasp.4.6 the site projected DOS can be evaluated for LORBIT=10-12, even if NPAR is not equal 1 (contrary to
previous releases). "
Best wishes.
Last edited by VASP001 on Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- VASP001
- Jr. Member
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:56 pm
- License Nr.: 176, upgraded to paw
- Location: Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale
The 'error' in the computation of B3LYP ?
[quote="gbal"]I had the same problem, check the number of processors that you have and multiply by the number of nodes! For me it worked![/quote]
Thank you !I will try doing it as your suggestion.
Thank you !I will try doing it as your suggestion.
Last edited by VASP001 on Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.