symmetric slab optimization

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
apple
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:09 pm

symmetric slab optimization

#1 Post by apple » Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:04 pm

hi,
I am optimizing a surface slab of an inverse spinel structure with two sides prepared to be perfectly symmetric in the POSCAR file. However, when optimizing it with ISYM=0 there are some deviations (less than 0.026 A though) in the bond lengths for the equivalent atom pairs in the two surfaces (two sides). Can someone comment if the observed deviations are too big to be due to numerical noise. Could they be due to the isym flag set to zero, or there is something wrong with my poscar?
Thanks.
Last edited by apple on Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kambiz
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm

symmetric slab optimization

#2 Post by kambiz » Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:36 am

Hi,

Are you using spin-polarized calculations? Are you adding any U term to your system?
Last edited by kambiz on Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

apple
Jr. Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 99
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:09 pm

symmetric slab optimization

#3 Post by apple » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:07 pm

Yes, I am doing spin-polarized calculations with Ueff terms. Why should it matter?
Last edited by apple on Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kambiz
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:10 pm

symmetric slab optimization

#4 Post by kambiz » Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:11 am

Optimize your structure with non-spin polarized tag and then check your structure
Last edited by kambiz on Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply