Charge defects in bulk

Queries about input and output files, running specific calculations, etc.


Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator

Post Reply
Message
Author
abu

Charge defects in bulk

#1 Post by abu » Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:10 am

Hi there
I am trying to calculate defect in TiO2. I have a reasonable big supercell (192 atoms). I want to calculate point defect in bulk (putting one more Ti atom in interstitial site). With putting one more Ti atom, the system is converged nicely.
Now, I want to put Ti4+ ion instead of Ti atom. I add following extra tag in the INCAR file.
NELECT = 1024 (1028 for neutral system)
IDIPOL = 4 (I tried with 3 and did not work)
LDIPOL = .TRUE.
I am using vasp 4.6.20 version.
I did not find any converge structure, in 2nd/3rd structural iteration, I found a weird structure. i.e., some atoms come too close together and some move far away from others.
Could you please give me an idea what wrong I am doing and what should I try.
Thankx
Last edited by abu on Fri Jun 22, 2007 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

admin
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2921
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
License Nr.: 458

Charge defects in bulk

#2 Post by admin » Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:35 pm

charge cannot be assigned to a specific atom in all PW and mixed-basis set calculations, by setting NELECT, the cell is
charged.
Last edited by admin on Fri Jun 22, 2007 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

abu

Charge defects in bulk

#3 Post by abu » Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:56 pm

Yes, if we consider the cell is charged, is there any suitable way to structure minimization. As I said, setting the above criteria gives me some weird structure. Without multi-pole correction (deleting IDIPOL and LDIPOL tag from INCAR file), the structure is converged. However, the energy is around 20 eV higher than neutral cell.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Sat Jun 23 2007, 02:31PM ]</span>
Last edited by abu on Fri Jun 22, 2007 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Alenushka
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:26 pm

Charge defects in bulk

#4 Post by Alenushka » Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:57 pm

From my experience, if you keep IDIPOL, then it will be converged, I have problems only if I switch the LDIPOL on.
Here: http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/n ... car-dipol2

LDIPOL is needed only if you like to switch the potential coorection mode, IDIPOL is enough to have corrections:
"Both corrections (quadrupole only for charged systems) will be calculated and added to the total energy if the IDIPOL flag is set."
Last edited by Alenushka on Tue Jun 26, 2007 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply