Hello,
Please, can you tell me what is the pseudo virtual ground state configuration for uranium atom ? (Indeed, DFT calculation I performed on uranium atom give with a non spin-polarized configuration a value of about -2.00 eV).
On the other hand, does it possible to display in OUTCAR file, the numbers of electrons in each orbitals s, p, d, f ?
Thanks you for your help,
Ron.
Uranium ground state configuration
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:05 am
Uranium ground state configuration
Last edited by ron on Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Full Member
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 1:27 pm
- License Nr.: 567
- Location: France
Uranium ground state configuration
Hi
I did not quite understand your first question, but as for the second one, you can have the numbers of electrons in each orbital by setting LORBIT = 10 in the INCAR file.
Regards.
Boris.
I did not quite understand your first question, but as for the second one, you can have the numbers of electrons in each orbital by setting LORBIT = 10 in the INCAR file.
Regards.
Boris.
Last edited by boris on Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 11:05 am
Uranium ground state configuration
Boris,
Thanks a lot for you reply, I tested LORBIT TAG, but I lost some electrons during operation, i.e. total electron number is non entire value in OUTCAR table: 11.75 for uranium compared to 14 initial valence electrons. About my first question, I try to define the ground state of uranium atom in non spin-polarisation configuration (f3d1s2 or f4d0s2 or ... ). For uranium, the ground state calculated by VASP seems to be different from the ground state used by VASP to generate the pseudo-potential. It react the same way that certain d-elements of periodical table for which virtual ground state are used, for instance Zr, W or Ir (manual page 131).
Regards,
Ron
Thanks a lot for you reply, I tested LORBIT TAG, but I lost some electrons during operation, i.e. total electron number is non entire value in OUTCAR table: 11.75 for uranium compared to 14 initial valence electrons. About my first question, I try to define the ground state of uranium atom in non spin-polarisation configuration (f3d1s2 or f4d0s2 or ... ). For uranium, the ground state calculated by VASP seems to be different from the ground state used by VASP to generate the pseudo-potential. It react the same way that certain d-elements of periodical table for which virtual ground state are used, for instance Zr, W or Ir (manual page 131).
Regards,
Ron
Last edited by ron on Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 6:59 pm
- License Nr.: 40 (vasp+paw)
Uranium ground state configuration
Ron,
The non-integer value happens because of the approximation that vasp uses to calculate orbital occupations (http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/node127.html).
Regards,
Alberto
The non-integer value happens because of the approximation that vasp uses to calculate orbital occupations (http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp/vasp/node127.html).
Regards,
Alberto
Last edited by alberto.trj on Tue Nov 03, 2009 12:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.