When determining the lm-decomposed density of states for collinear calculations with the lm-ordering:
s, p_y, p_z, p_x, d_xy, d_yz, d_z2-r2, d_xz, d_x2-y2.
does the z-component (e.g. p_z) correspond to the orbital orientation along the carteesian vector (0, 0, 1) or which reference direction is considered? The interpretation of the projected charge densities depend on if the z-axis corresponds to (0, 0, 1) or (1, 0, 0).
Best regards,
/Dan Fors
EDITED:
Resolved the issue by looking at a diatomic molecule and concluded the directions judging from the symmetry. Thank you all anyway.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Reference direction - lm decomposed DOS
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
-
- Sr. Member
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:07 am
- License Nr.: 173
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Reference direction - lm decomposed DOS
Last edited by forsdan on Fri May 16, 2008 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
Reference direction - lm decomposed DOS
dear Dan Fors,
you are correct, the principal axis is taken to be the z-axis of the lattice (box) in VASP, it is not aligned along the binding axis of the molecule (as you might suppose for a molecule which is not oriented along z)
actually, the l,m splitting is (l,-m),... l,0, (l,m), hence the correspondence to the labels px...of course only holds for certain lattice types
you are correct, the principal axis is taken to be the z-axis of the lattice (box) in VASP, it is not aligned along the binding axis of the molecule (as you might suppose for a molecule which is not oriented along z)
actually, the l,m splitting is (l,-m),... l,0, (l,m), hence the correspondence to the labels px...of course only holds for certain lattice types
Last edited by admin on Mon May 19, 2008 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.