band structure of graphene
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
band structure of graphene
Hello,
I have been trying to run a band structure calculation of graphene surface on VASP 4.6. I optimize the structure first by getting the kpoints, ENCUT, and lattice constant. Then I do a self-consistent calculation to get the charge density. I have the KPOINT file Gamma centered with a mesh of 12 x 12 x 1. Here is the INCAR
SYSTEM =C
restart settings
ISTART = 0
ICHARG = 2
output settings
LCHARG = .TRUE.
LWAVE = .TRUE.
settings for parallel version (ignored in serial run)
NPAR = 1 how many bands in parallel
LPLANE = .TRUE. distribute each wave over processors
Electronic Relaxation 1
ENCUT = 400
PREC = High Medium=default, Low, High; affects ENMAX, mesh, pspot
EDIFF = 1E-06 energy stopping-criterion for electr. iterations
IALGO = 48
NELM = 40
NELMIN = 3
NBANDS = 8
Ionic Relaxation
IBRION = 2
ISIF = 2
NSW = 100 max number of geometry steps
EDIFFG = -1E-02 stopping-criterion for IOM
POTIM = 0.5
DOS related values:
ISMEAR = -5 -4-tet -1-fermi 1=Methfessel/Paxton 1.order
SIGMA = 0.12
I follow this calculation with a non self-consistent run using the charge density from the previous run. Here are the parameters that I change in the INCAR
ICHARG = 11
IBRION = -1
NSW = 0
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
and here is the KPOINT file for the band structure non self-consistent run.
kpoints of graphene
10 ! 10 intersections
Line-mode
reciprocal
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0 0 0 ! gamma
0 0 0 ! gamma
0.5774 0.5774 0 ! M
0.5774 0.5774 0 ! M
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0 0 0 ! gamma
The valence bands seem correct but the conduction bands are not. I have tried changing some parameters in the INCAR, like ENCUT, but I still have the same problem. IS there something I'm supposed to add to the INCAR for the conduction bands? Any help will be much appreciated.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
I have been trying to run a band structure calculation of graphene surface on VASP 4.6. I optimize the structure first by getting the kpoints, ENCUT, and lattice constant. Then I do a self-consistent calculation to get the charge density. I have the KPOINT file Gamma centered with a mesh of 12 x 12 x 1. Here is the INCAR
SYSTEM =C
restart settings
ISTART = 0
ICHARG = 2
output settings
LCHARG = .TRUE.
LWAVE = .TRUE.
settings for parallel version (ignored in serial run)
NPAR = 1 how many bands in parallel
LPLANE = .TRUE. distribute each wave over processors
Electronic Relaxation 1
ENCUT = 400
PREC = High Medium=default, Low, High; affects ENMAX, mesh, pspot
EDIFF = 1E-06 energy stopping-criterion for electr. iterations
IALGO = 48
NELM = 40
NELMIN = 3
NBANDS = 8
Ionic Relaxation
IBRION = 2
ISIF = 2
NSW = 100 max number of geometry steps
EDIFFG = -1E-02 stopping-criterion for IOM
POTIM = 0.5
DOS related values:
ISMEAR = -5 -4-tet -1-fermi 1=Methfessel/Paxton 1.order
SIGMA = 0.12
I follow this calculation with a non self-consistent run using the charge density from the previous run. Here are the parameters that I change in the INCAR
ICHARG = 11
IBRION = -1
NSW = 0
ISMEAR = 0
SIGMA = 0.05
and here is the KPOINT file for the band structure non self-consistent run.
kpoints of graphene
10 ! 10 intersections
Line-mode
reciprocal
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0 0 0 ! gamma
0 0 0 ! gamma
0.5774 0.5774 0 ! M
0.5774 0.5774 0 ! M
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0.6666 0.3333 0 ! K
0 0 0 ! gamma
The valence bands seem correct but the conduction bands are not. I have tried changing some parameters in the INCAR, like ENCUT, but I still have the same problem. IS there something I'm supposed to add to the INCAR for the conduction bands? Any help will be much appreciated.
<span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited ]</span>
Last edited by sergio on Fri Apr 17, 2009 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2019 11:00 am
Re: band structure of graphene
Hi,
We're sorry that we didn’t answer your question. This does not live up to the quality of support that we aim to provide. The team has since expanded. If we can still help with your problem, please ask again in a new post, linking to this one, and we will answer as quickly as possible.
Best wishes,
VASP