Dear all.
i have a problem when i calculate the frequence and transition state. There are always several f/i when i calculate the frequence with a relaxed
structure, while there is no f/i when i calculate the frequence with the NEB transition state result.
the incars are as listed here:
SYSTEM =
ENCUT = 400
ISTART = 0 ; ICHARG=2
ISMEAR = 2 ; SIGMA = 0.2
ISIF = 2
IBRION = 5
POTIM = 0.024
NFREE = 2
NSW =400
PREC = HIGH
EDIFF = 0.000001
SYSTEM =
ISTART = 0 ; ICHARG=2
ISMEAR = 2 ; SIGMA = 0.2
ISPIN = 2
IMAGES = 4
SPRING = -5
IALGO = 48
ENCUT = 400
dynamic:
IBRION = 1
NSW = 400
NFREE = 2
POTIM = 0.2
about transition state and frequence
Moderators: Global Moderator, Moderator
about transition state and frequence
Last edited by fegg7502 on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2921
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:18 am
- License Nr.: 458
about transition state and frequence
I suppose that you use INCAR1for both calculations of the vibrational spectrum, and INCAR2 for the NEB run only, do you?
please check:
-- does the TS really correspond to the geometry with the maximum total energy along the reaction path?
-- are all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to 10-6 or did some of the steps simply finish after 60 electronic scf steps without being actually converged
-- usually, POTIM should even be chosen smaller in INCAR1 (0.01 to 0.015) to make sure that you are in the harmonic limit
please check:
-- does the TS really correspond to the geometry with the maximum total energy along the reaction path?
-- are all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to 10-6 or did some of the steps simply finish after 60 electronic scf steps without being actually converged
-- usually, POTIM should even be chosen smaller in INCAR1 (0.01 to 0.015) to make sure that you are in the harmonic limit
Last edited by admin on Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
about transition state and frequence
the TS really correspond to the geometry with the maximum total energy along the reaction path
all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to the defult value
all displacement steps (for both, ground and transition state) converged electronically up to the defult value
Last edited by fegg7502 on Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Newbie
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:29 pm
about transition state and frequence
Isn't there some concern that basis set incompleteness makes a small POTIM a bad idea?
Last edited by camilo on Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:09 am, edited 1 time in total.